The Architecture of Global Control and Information Warfare
The provided analysis posits that global power is fundamentally structured as a global public-private partnership (PPP), controlled not by nation-states but by a class of unelected oligarchs. This framework converts governments into an “enabling environment” for policies that facilitate massive wealth transfers, mask systemic financial criminality, and erode individual sovereignty. The ultimate objective is the implementation of an integrated system of total surveillance and financial control, characterized by digital identities and programmable, surveillable money.
This agenda is advanced through sophisticated information warfare and the manufacturing of consent. Fear is the primary tool used to ensure public compliance, deployed through a series of manufactured crises. The media landscape, including a significant portion of the “independent media,” is presented as a co-opted apparatus funded by intelligence-linked oligarchs to control public discourse. Figures with manufactured anti-establishment credibility are used to channel dissent and ultimately sell the same control systems under a different guise. The distinction between public-sector solutions (like CBDCs) and private-sector alternatives (like bank-issued stablecoins) is described as a deliberate trap, as both lead to the same outcome of centralized, programmable control over individual financial life. Resisting this agenda requires critical thinking, media literacy, and the development of decentralized, parallel systems.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The Global Public-Private Partnership: The Core Mechanism of Control
The central argument is that the world is run by a global PPP that functionally subordinates the nation-state to the policy objectives of unelected oligarchs and private entities like the World Economic Forum (WEF).
1.1. The “Public vs. Private” Trap
A key tactic identified is the creation of a false dichotomy between the public and private sectors. While the public sector (e.g., the UN, WEF) is often criticized in independent media, this criticism is used to herd the populace toward private-sector “solutions” that are controlled by the same actors.
The Trap: The narrative is designed to make people believe the problem lies solely with corrupt public entities. The proposed answer is to place power “all in the hand of the private sector.”
The Reality: The private sector actors promoted as the solution are the same “career financial criminals” who created the PPPs. This structure allows Wall Street giants to engage in “blatantly illegal financial activity and fraud” with “complete impunity.” Shifting from a public figurehead like Jerome Powell (Federal Reserve) to a private one like Jamie Dimon (JP Morgan) is described as having “no functional difference” for the average person.
1.2. Private Control of Public Institutions
Ostensibly public or state-connected institutions are, in fact, privately owned and controlled.
The Federal Reserve: The U.S. Federal Reserve is not a true state entity but is “owned and run” by commercial banks, specifically naming JP Morgan. The oligarchs engineering global wealth transfers are the same people who “ultimately control the Federal Reserve.”
Treasury Department: Under the Trump administration, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin—a figure who “should have been prosecuted for what he did in the 2008 financial crisis”—oversaw fiscally irresponsible COVID policies. The money printed was “handed off to BlackRock,” managed by Larry Fink, who previously managed the Trump family’s finances and was appointed to Trump’s business council.
2. The Agenda of Total Surveillance and Financial Control
The PPP framework is used to construct a global system of total surveillance that erodes privacy and centralizes control over all aspects of life, particularly financial.
2.1. Total Information Awareness
The ultimate goal is to achieve “Total Information Awareness,” a concept originating from a DARPA program. This involves the complete erosion of privacy through opaque public-private partnerships.
Scope of Surveillance: The ambition is to “completely surveil everything,” including:
Financial Surveillance: Tracking what individuals buy at the grocery store.
Biological Surveillance: Used to “stop pandemics before they start.”
The “Pre-Crime” Objective: The purpose of this total surveillance is algorithmic prevention, or to “prevent X before it happens,” where “X” is anything the controllers wish to stop. This includes pre-crime (legalized in the U.S. by Attorney General William Barr), pandemics, terrorist attacks, and “climate calamity.”
2.2. Programmable Money and the CBDC Trap
A bipartisan consensus exists among the oligarch class to implement an integrated system of digital IDs and programmable, surveillable money, which represents a major threat to individual liberty and financial freedom.
Public vs. Private Implementation: When the public resists a public-sector Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), a deliberate effort is made to sell the “functionally the same thing” as a private-sector product.
Private Sector Alternatives: Wall Street banks are actively pushing for alternatives such as tokenized deposits and bank-issued stablecoins.
The Illusion of Sovereignty: This rhetoric is designed to create a false sense of victory, making people believe they have achieved “financial freedom and sovereignty” by rejecting a government CBDC. However, these private systems are described as “just as bad if not worse” because they can be equally programmable and surveillable.
Centralization: The push for an “everything app”—a single, centralized application for one’s entire financial life—further consolidates this control. Elon Musk’s support for such an app on X (formerly Twitter) is noted.
2.3. Financial Schemes as Control Mechanisms
New financial markets are created under the guise of solving global crises but function as wealth-extraction “grifts.”
The Carbon Market: The voluntary carbon market is described as “junk bonds on steroids.” Framed as a “planetary imperative” to avert climate disaster, it is identified as a scheme that creates a new market for financial criminals to continue their “extreme fiscal irresponsibility” and “steal everyone’s money and wealth.” These carbon credits have been repeatedly exposed as “meaningless” by groups on both the political right and left.
Drexel Burnham Lambert Network: Key figures from the junk bond era of Drexel Burnham Lambert are deeply involved in these new schemes.
Michael Milken: The “junk bond guy” is “all in for the sustainable development goals.
”
Craig Cogut: Formerly of Drexel’s junk bond department, he directly finances groups that created the “green plus program.”
3. Manufacturing Consent: The Weaponization of Information
An unprecedented amount of money and effort is being directed toward manipulating public perception to manufacture consent for these control systems. This is achieved through fear, social division, and the co-opting of media.
3.1. Fear as the Primary Tool of Compliance
The entire control apparatus runs on fear. Major global events are leveraged to create a climate of fear that ensures compliance.
Historical Precedents: Events like 9/11 and the COVID-19 pandemic were used to make people “fall in line because of fear.”
Future Operations: It is predicted that the 2024 election year will see “unprecedented fear-based scyops... one after the other” to divide the populace (”textbook divide and conquer”) and push them toward compliance.
3.2. The Co-opting of Independent Media
The independent media sphere is described as having become “a big part of the problem,” serving to perpetuate fear and division for clicks and often funded by the same oligarchs it purports to expose.
“Mainstream Media Light”: By using fear and anger to generate clicks and “rile people up,” independent media has adopted the tactics of the mainstream, failing to promote critical thinking.
Oligarch Funding: Numerous prominent independent media figures are funded by “intelligence linked oligarchs” like Peter Thiel.
Social Media Manipulation: The U.S. military has invested millions over a decade in social media manipulation techniques. It is considered “very naive” to believe this would cease on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), given that its owner, Elon Musk, is a major Pentagon contractor and supports policies like the carbon tax championed by figures like Larry Fink and the WEF.
3.3. Case Study: Tucker Carlson and Manufactured Credibility
Tucker Carlson is presented as a prime example of a media figure with manufactured anti-establishment credibility used to control discourse.
Aspect of Concern
Details Provided in Source
Funding Sources
His new media company is said to have funding from Peter Thiel. He is described as “still very well funded,” and observers are encouraged to interrogate his financial backing.
Family History
His father, Dick Carlson, ran the U.S. Information Agency under Reagan, which was in charge of propaganda operations supporting the Contras in Nicaragua and covering up aspects of Iran-Contra.
Manufactured Image
His firing from Fox News gave him “renewed... anti-establishment credibility,” yet his history includes being “very cozy” with figures like Rachel Maddow at MSNBC.
Discourse Control
The immense focus on his interview with Vladimir Putin made him the “press freedom story of the month,” potentially distracting from Julian Assange’s final extradition hearing.
The ultimate goal of promoting such figures is to “manufacture trust” so they can be “used in the future to sell you the same stuff at the end of the day.”
4. Key Actors and Networks of Influence
The sources identify a web of interconnected individuals and firms spanning finance, technology, and government, who are advancing this agenda.
Individual / Firm
Affiliation / Role
Key Actions and Connections
Steven Mnuchin
Fmr. Trump Treasury Secretary, VC Firm Head
Avoided prosecution for 2008 financial crisis actions. His VC firm’s first investment was in Cyber Reason, an Israeli intelligence firm that gamed out canceling a U.S. election via cyberattack. His firm has ties to fmr. Mossad director Yossi Cohen.
Larry Fink
CEO, BlackRock
Managed Trump family finances; appointed to Trump’s business council. Received and distributed money printed during COVID-19 response. A key proponent of policies aligned with the WEF.
Michael Milken
Financier, Drexel Alumnus
Known as the “junk bond guy.” Now a major supporter of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Craig Cogut
Financier, Drexel Alumnus
From Drexel’s junk bond department. Financially backs groups that created the “green plus program” and is linked to the head of Satalogic, a key satellite company.
Peter Thiel
Oligarch, Tech Investor
Described as an “intelligence linked oligarch” who funds prominent figures in independent media, including Tucker Carlson’s new company.
Sheldon Adelson
Deceased GOP Donor
Was Trump’s biggest funder. His influence led to John Bolton’s appointment and the U.S. embassy move to Jerusalem.
Elon Musk
CEO, Tesla, SpaceX, X
A major Pentagon contractor. Supports policies like the carbon tax and the “everything app,” aligning him with figures like Larry Fink and the WEF agenda.
5. Proposed Counter-Strategies
The analysis concludes by outlining strategies for individuals to resist this consolidation of control.
Resist Fear: The primary method of control is fear. Resisting fear-based narratives and psyops is the first step. Unplugging from online discourse and engaging more with the physical world is recommended.
Embrace Critical Thinking: Individuals must become their own researchers and journalists. This involves questioning narratives, examining source material, assessing information objectively, and paying attention to actions over rhetoric.
Develop Media Literacy: It is incumbent on everyone to understand that media is weaponized. One must be wary of all sources, regardless of whether they are mainstream or “independent,” and critically interrogate funding and potential conflicts of interest.
Build Parallel Systems: The most tangible form of resistance is building and participating in decentralized, parallel systems—not just in finance, but in all aspects of life. This creates the ability to refuse to onboard to the mandatory digital ID/programmable money system.
Co-opting Independent Media: The Tucker Carlson Example
The Tucker Carlson example illustrates a fundamental strategy in the larger context of Co-opting Independent Media: the use of figures who possess manufactured anti-establishment credibility but are ultimately funded by and aligned with the oligarchic structures they appear to criticize.
The Tucker Carlson Example: Funding and Credibility
Specific details about Carlson that challenge his independent status:
1. Funding by Intelligence-Linked Oligarchs: Many prominent figures in independent media are funded by “intelligence linked oligarchs” who are believed to be responsible for significant negative global activities. Specifically, Peter Thiel is named as an oligarch who funds various prominent independent media figures. The source states that Tucker Carlson’s new media company has “some Thiel funding for example behind it”. People are encouraged to “interrogate some of his funding sources currently” and any potential conflicts of interest, as he is “still very well funded”.
2. Manufactured Anti-Establishment Image: Carlson’s trajectory included being “very cozy with figures like Rachel Madowl” while at MSNBC. His subsequent departure (firing) from Fox News has given him a “renewed or this rather newer anti-establishment credibility behind him”. Despite this, the source does not view him as necessarily “anti-establishment”.
3. Historical Family Ties to Propaganda: Carlson’s father ran the U.S. Information Agency under President Reagan, which was responsible for propaganda operations. These operations included supporting the arming of the Contras in Nicaragua, aspects of Iran Contra and its cover-up, and CIA oversight of “dirty wars and mass elimination of of political dissident by CIA backed dictatorships” in Latin America.
Larger Context: Co-opting Independent Media for Control
The Carlson example highlights how powerful actors manipulate the media landscape to “manufacture trust” and control public discourse.
• The Intent to “Sell the Same Stuff”: The development of trusted new media figures is part of a “manufactured effort” to execute a “phase shift”—moving the rhetoric from one side to the other—to develop figures trusted by the people. The concern is that these figures, even if currently perceived as anti-establishment, will ultimately “be used in the future to sell you the same stuff at the end of the day”.
• Media Becoming “Mainstream Media Light”: The independent media sphere has become part of the problem by relying on “click metrics” and using “fear and anger” to rile people up, effectively becoming “mainstream media light”. This focus often supersedes the promotion of critical thinking.
• Distraction and Manipulation: Highly publicized media events involving figures like Carlson can serve as a distraction. For example, the focus on Carlson’s interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin caused him to become the “press freedom story” of the moment, potentially diverting attention from the more critical issue of Julian Assange’s final extradition hearing.
• The Ultimate Goal: Manufacturing Consent: This co-opting of media is part of a deliberate effort to “engineer consent and trust among the populace” for policies the oligarchs wish to implement, such as digital ID and programmable surveillable money. Intense funding is going into manipulating how people perceive events to “manufacture consent for these systems”.
The world is primarily run by a global public-private partnership rather than solely a corrupt public sector, a trap she believes the public is being led into. She focuses on the influence of unelected oligarchs who control institutions like the Federal Reserve and Wall Street giants, accusing them of orchestrating massive wealth transfers and engaging in financial criminality. Webb connects these powerful figures, specifically referencing those tied to Drexel Burnham Lambert, to modern initiatives such as sustainable development goals and the promotion of carbon credit markets as a deceptive financial tool.
The discussion also coverd the expansion of surveillance, digital identity systems, and programmable money (like CBDCs or tokenized deposits), warning that these systems are being advanced under the guise of both public and private sector solutions, often fueled by manufactured fear and the manipulation of public discourse through media and social platforms.
FOR DONATIONS AND SUPPORT. click
